# Methodology Summary

© 2026 Ajay Chaturvedi. IKSMHA, IIT Mandi. All rights reserved.

Canonical source structure, verse-to-rule trace, historical replay (1901–2026), benchmark firewall (no post-hoc fitting), evidence classification, prospective versus retrospective computation, null findings and limitations are documented in the in-app Methodology screens.


## Calendrical sophistication

The successful computational reconstruction of this system demonstrates the sophistication of the calendrical and astronomical knowledge on which it rests. Its internal coherence, reproducibility and ability to generate testable seasonal structures suggest a highly developed understanding of time, celestial cycles and natural processes.

A system capable of being reconstructed, executed and tested across more than a century of data cannot be dismissed as loose symbolism. Its operational coherence is testimony to the depth of the calendrical science from which it emerged.

Operational coherence strengthens the case for the sophistication and antiquity of the calendrical tradition. It does not, by itself, settle every chronological dispute; textual, astronomical and historical arguments remain relevant.


## Chronology note

VARĀHĪ follows the earlier chronology that places Ācārya Varāhamihira in the first century BCE, within the intellectual world associated with Mahārāja Vikramāditya and Ujjayinī. Modern academic histories often place him in the sixth century CE based on a different interpretation of chronological and textual evidence. The project states its adopted chronology openly and preserves the debate in the scholarly notes.